| Revision as of 16:04, 19 December 2012 (edit) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) (New page: <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ == Valérie Cossy == <br><br> '''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br> '''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br...) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (16:12, 19 December 2012) (edit) (undo) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision not shown.) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| '''Abstract'''<br><br> | '''Abstract'''<br><br> | ||
| - | Raymond Trousson:<br> | + | In this article, Valérie Cossy wonders about the way Isabelle de Charrière negotiated a universal concept of “equality” under the auspices of Rous-seau, whose writings she generally admired. In her “Eloge de Jean-Jacques Rousseau”, she presents him as the thinker whose vision (which she calls “dreams”) makes it possible to think of and act about social pro-gress. Without the theoretical concept of men that are innately good and innately equal to each other, she argues, one would not bother to change the world. How then could she reconcile her dynamic and progressive in-terpretation of Rousseau with what he had written about women in the fifth chapter of ''Emile''? There, his definition of “Sophie” as an individual whose human existence is entirely relative to that of her future male com-panion and in need of an education absolutely distinct from that given to Emile strikes us, indeed, as being completely at odds with Isabelle de Charrière’s – and for that matter with the younger Belle de Zuylen’s – customary impatience with the patriarchal order. And yet, while Rous-seau is explicitly named by her as the “patron” of her last collection of novellas (the “recueil de l’Abbé de la Tour”), she does not express the slightest critique against what she must have considered the rigid and de-basing assignment of women to a subservient and unthinking role. Or does she? This paper argues that Charrière relies on her usual indirectness to address, through irony, the problematic inheritance of Rousseau in matters of gender without giving ammunition to his conservative enemies. Through ''Sainte Anne'', in particular, Charrière invites us to take into con-sideration the possibility of a human understanding unmarked by gender. Through novelistic situations and through irony she manages to maintain her life-long belief in a form of human equality that would include aristo-crats and non aristocrats as well as men and women. |
| - | *[[Deux Neuchâtelois]] au concours de l’Académie française en 1790 : Isabelle de Charrière et François-Louis d’Escherny (p. 27)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Timothée Léchot: <br> | + | |
| - | * [[L’exception qui confirme les règles]] : le génie littéraire de Rousseau perçu par Isabelle de Charrière et Henri-David Chaillet (p. 41)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Virginie Pasche:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Théorie et enjeux moraux]] de la fiction chez Rousseau et Isabelle de Charrière (p. 55)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Laurence Vanoflen:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Rousseau, Charrière… et Fiévée]] : l’économie des alliances. Regards croisés sur l’inégalité sociale (p. 71) <br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Paul Pelckmans:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Du Vicaire Savoyard à l’Abbé de la Tour]]. A propos d’''Honorine d’Userche'' (p. 84)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Jean-Daniel Candaux:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Thérèse Levasseur]], ou les avatars d’une image (1762-1789) (p. 99)<br><br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | '''RECENTLY DISCOVERED'''<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Kees van Strien: <br> | + | |
| - | *Monsieur de Charrière travelling tutor to Belle’s brother Willem-René (p. 109)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Hein H. Jongbloed: <br> | + | |
| - | * Four new items of “Belle-lettrie” (1797-1799)(p. 117)<br><br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | '''RECENT PUBLICATIONS'''<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Virginie Pasche:<br> | + | |
| - | * Christie Mc Donald et Susan Rubin Suleiman (éds.), ''French Global: A New Approach to Literary History'' (p. 133)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Monique Moser-Verrey:<br> | + | |
| - | *Valérie Cossy, ''Isabelle de Charrière. Ecrire pour vivre autrement'' (p. 136)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Valérie Cossy:<br> | + | |
| - | *Erik Leborgne, ''Trois romans d’Isabelle de Charrière'' (p. 140)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Suzan van Dijk:<br> | + | |
| - | *Anne-Laure Juillerat e.a., ''DuPeyrou: un homme et son hôtel'' (p. 142)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Madeleine van Strien-Chardonneau:<br> | + | |
| - | *Bibliographical notes (p. 146)<br><br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | '''NEWS'''<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Elisabeth Crettaz:<br> | + | |
| - | *« Sa Majesté en Suisse ». Neuchâtel, la Prusse et les femmes à l’époque des Lumières : annonce d’une exposition (p. 152)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Editorial board: <br> | + | |
| - | * Annonces et nouvelles (p. 160)<br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| Line 69: | Line 19: | ||
| <br> | <br> | ||
| - | *Publications > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Cahiers_Isabelle_de_Charriere_/_Belle_de_Zuylen_Papers Belle de Zuylen Papers] > 2012<br><br> | + | *Publications > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Cahiers_Isabelle_de_Charriere_/_Belle_de_Zuylen_Papers Belle de Zuylen Papers] > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/READING_CHARRIERE_IN_THE_LIGHT_OF_ROUSSEAU_AND_VICE_VERSA 2012]<br><br> |
Current revision
Valérie Cossy
Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les
incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière
Abstract
In this article, Valérie Cossy wonders about the way Isabelle de Charrière negotiated a universal concept of “equality” under the auspices of Rous-seau, whose writings she generally admired. In her “Eloge de Jean-Jacques Rousseau”, she presents him as the thinker whose vision (which she calls “dreams”) makes it possible to think of and act about social pro-gress. Without the theoretical concept of men that are innately good and innately equal to each other, she argues, one would not bother to change the world. How then could she reconcile her dynamic and progressive in-terpretation of Rousseau with what he had written about women in the fifth chapter of Emile? There, his definition of “Sophie” as an individual whose human existence is entirely relative to that of her future male com-panion and in need of an education absolutely distinct from that given to Emile strikes us, indeed, as being completely at odds with Isabelle de Charrière’s – and for that matter with the younger Belle de Zuylen’s – customary impatience with the patriarchal order. And yet, while Rous-seau is explicitly named by her as the “patron” of her last collection of novellas (the “recueil de l’Abbé de la Tour”), she does not express the slightest critique against what she must have considered the rigid and de-basing assignment of women to a subservient and unthinking role. Or does she? This paper argues that Charrière relies on her usual indirectness to address, through irony, the problematic inheritance of Rousseau in matters of gender without giving ammunition to his conservative enemies. Through Sainte Anne, in particular, Charrière invites us to take into con-sideration the possibility of a human understanding unmarked by gender. Through novelistic situations and through irony she manages to maintain her life-long belief in a form of human equality that would include aristo-crats and non aristocrats as well as men and women.
SvD, December 2012
- Publications > Belle de Zuylen Papers > 2012