(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:09, 28 October 2011 (edit)
SvDijk (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (14:21, 12 September 2012) (edit) (undo)
AKulsdom (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 18: Line 18:
-SvD, October 2011<br><br><br>+AsK, September 2012<br><br><br>
<hr> <hr>
<br> <br>
*Conferences > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/NEWW_international_conferences NEWW international conferences] > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Oxford/Chawton%2C_November_2011 Chawton November 2011] > Dutu <br><br> *Conferences > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/NEWW_international_conferences NEWW international conferences] > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Oxford/Chawton%2C_November_2011 Chawton November 2011] > Dutu <br><br>

Current revision


Carmen Dutu




The story so far: toward a (Frin)Gender perspective within COST Action IS0901

Abstract

During the Training School in The Hague in May 2011, one key issue during the debates was that the COST Action is not meant to be a project, but rather a “collection” of research projects encouraging collaborative research between different individuals/institutions/geographical areas. Based on the evidence that in the South–Eastern European area we share a common historical past, the present paper explores the perspective of a "FrinGender" collaborative research proposal: to include the countries that roughly cover the notion of S-E Europe (the so-called “Balkan” area, even though, strictly speaking from a geographical point of view, the term is far from accurate: Romania, for instance, is not a Balkan country, per se). More specifically, the paper will examine to which extent the scope of the COST Action framework may (or may not) be applied to HERstory (literary or otherwise) simply because of the historical breach between the East and the West.








AsK, September 2012




Personal tools