(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 16:09, 19 December 2012 (edit) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) (New page: <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ == Valérie Cossy == <br><br> '''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br> '''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br...) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (16:41, 19 December 2012) (edit) (undo) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ | <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
| - | == Valérie Cossy == | + | == Jean-Daniel Candaux == |
| <br><br> | <br><br> | ||
| - | '''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br> | + | '''Thérèse Levasseur, ou les avatars d’une image (1762-1789)'''<br><br> |
| - | '''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br><br> | + | |
| '''Abstract'''<br><br> | '''Abstract'''<br><br> | ||
| - | + | Jean-Daniel Candaux provides us with a precious list of the different books and pamphlets that shaped the public image of Thérèse Levasseur up to the publication by Charrière of her own ''Plainte et défense de Thérèse Levasseur''. This much needed context enables one to assess the originality of Charrière’s pamphlet when contrasted with its predecessors – some of which she directly replies to within the ''Plainte et défense''. One gains a better informed view of the various depictions – not to say ghosts – against which Charrière launched her “vindication”, in which she pretends to let Thérèse speak in her own voice by relying on a first-person narrative. | |
| - | Raymond Trousson:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Deux Neuchâtelois]] au concours de l’Académie française en 1790 : Isabelle de Charrière et François-Louis d’Escherny (p. 27)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Timothée Léchot: <br> | + | |
| - | * [[L’exception qui confirme les règles]] : le génie littéraire de Rousseau perçu par Isabelle de Charrière et Henri-David Chaillet (p. 41)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Virginie Pasche:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Théorie et enjeux moraux]] de la fiction chez Rousseau et Isabelle de Charrière (p. 55)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Laurence Vanoflen:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Rousseau, Charrière… et Fiévée]] : l’économie des alliances. Regards croisés sur l’inégalité sociale (p. 71) <br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Paul Pelckmans:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Du Vicaire Savoyard à l’Abbé de la Tour]]. A propos d’''Honorine d’Userche'' (p. 84)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Jean-Daniel Candaux:<br> | + | |
| - | *[[Thérèse Levasseur]], ou les avatars d’une image (1762-1789) (p. 99)<br><br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | '''RECENTLY DISCOVERED'''<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Kees van Strien: <br> | + | |
| - | *Monsieur de Charrière travelling tutor to Belle’s brother Willem-René (p. 109)<br><br> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Hein H. Jongbloed: <br> | + | |
| - | * Four new items of “Belle-lettrie” (1797-1799)(p. 117)<br><br><br> | + | |
Current revision
Jean-Daniel Candaux
Thérèse Levasseur, ou les avatars d’une image (1762-1789)
Abstract
Jean-Daniel Candaux provides us with a precious list of the different books and pamphlets that shaped the public image of Thérèse Levasseur up to the publication by Charrière of her own Plainte et défense de Thérèse Levasseur. This much needed context enables one to assess the originality of Charrière’s pamphlet when contrasted with its predecessors – some of which she directly replies to within the Plainte et défense. One gains a better informed view of the various depictions – not to say ghosts – against which Charrière launched her “vindication”, in which she pretends to let Thérèse speak in her own voice by relying on a first-person narrative.
SvD, December 2012
- Publications > Belle de Zuylen Papers > 2012