Revision as of 23:21, 13 March 2008 (edit) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 23:30, 13 March 2008 (edit) (undo) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 30:		Line 30:
	Different types in different countries: <br>		Different types in different countries: <br>
	* France:<br>		* France:<br>
-	** La Porte, ''Histoire littéraire des femmes françaises'' (1769)<br>	+	** [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=authors&authorName=&pseudonym=1&year=&personal=&professional=&bibliography=la+porte&notesfield=&Editor_ID=geen&pageSize=50 La Porte, ''Histoire littéraire des femmes françaises''] (1769)<br>
-	** Briquet, ''Dictionnaire historique'' (1804)	+	** [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=briquet&Rec_Title=&reference=&pageSize=50&order=a2.name Briquet, ''Dictionnaire historique''] (1804)
	** XXX <br>		** XXX <br>
	* The Netherlands: <br>		* The Netherlands: <br>
-	** List Heinemeyer <br>	+	** [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=authors&authorName=&pseudonym=1&year=&personal=&professional=&bibliography=heinemeyer&notesfield=&Editor_ID=geen&pageSize=50 List Heinemeyer] <br>
-	** Correspondence Belle de Zuylen <br>	+	** [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&media_ID=4&source_ID=154&pageSize=50&order=r.Year Correspondence Belle de Zuylen] <br>
-	** Van der Aa <br><br>	+	** [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=1844&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&source_ID=936&pageSize=50&order=a2.name Van der Aa] <br><br>

---

Revision as of 23:30, 13 March 2008

Suzan van Dijk, Toward a collaborative research project

NEWW: New approaches to European Women’s Writing

Three starting points:

1.
Women’s literature should be approached on an international scale, allowing for:

• comparing and studying similarities (ex.: international development of women’s journalism)
  
• understanding impact and influence which may have transgressed national borders (ex.: Dutch reactions to works of a little known author as Mme Benoist).
  
  

2.
Women’s writing should be approached from the side of its reception, i.e. the contemporaneous reception.

• Dutch literary canon used to include, until recently, about five 18th-century women’s names;
  
• in this project, while starting at the reading end, 200 names of Dutch 18th-century writing women were found.
  
  

3.
This large approach corresponds to present possibilities:

• online available:
  
  • information about authors: www.siefar.org
    
  • texts: www.charriere.nl
    
  • and also: information about contemporary reception, which is contained in numbers of documents and inventories accessible on the internet, in particular the periodical press (such as the Dutch Vaderlandsche Letteroefeningen: www.e-laborate.nl), or lists of translations (the one by Buisman in www.dbnl.nl; ex.: translation of Mme Beccari).
    
• possibility to create structures where these information and documents can be assembled per author (ex.: Mme Dunoyer), in a collective enterprise where information and preliminary conclusions are shared and commented.
  
  
  

SOURCES

Different types in different countries:

• France:
  
  • La Porte, Histoire littéraire des femmes françaises (1769)
    
  • Briquet, Dictionnaire historique (1804)
  • XXX
    
• The Netherlands:
  
  • List Heinemeyer
    
  • Correspondence Belle de Zuylen
    
  • Van der Aa
    
    

SvD, March 2008

---

• Conferences > NEWW participations > ASECS 2008 > Van Dijk