Revision as of 23:45, 15 November 2011 (edit) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) (New page: <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ == Pim van Oostrum, Suzan van Dijk == <br><br> '''Sara Burgerhart et Marianne de La Prise.'''<br> '''Réponse à Paul Pelckmans'''<br><br> In this contribution th...) ← Previous diff		Current revision (23:55, 15 November 2011) (edit) (undo) SvDijk (Talk | contribs)
Line 16:		Line 16:
	<br>		<br>
-	*Publications > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Cahiers_Isabelle_de_Charriere_/_Belle_de_Zuylen_Papers Belle de Zuylen Papers] > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Submission_of_proposals_is_possible%2C_before_31_December_2010 2011] > Van Oostrum, van Dijk<br><br>	+	*Publications > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Cahiers_Isabelle_de_Charriere_/_Belle_de_Zuylen_Papers Belle de Zuylen Papers] > 2011 > Van Oostrum, van Dijk<br><br>

---

Current revision

Pim van Oostrum, Suzan van Dijk

Sara Burgerhart et Marianne de La Prise.
Réponse à Paul Pelckmans

In this contribution the authors engage in a discussion with Paul Pelckmans about the question if Isabelle de Charrière’s Lettres neuchâteloises (1784) have been, as she herself claimed in 1804, influenced by Betje Wolff and Aagje Deken’s Historie van Mejuffrouw Sara Burgerhart (1782). They tend to insist upon the use, in both novels, of narrative topoi about female solidarity and mutual help, which are not commonly found in contemporary novels written by men, and which have been surprisingly overlooked both in “traditional” and in more recent research concerning Wolff and Deken’s authorship.

SvD, November 2011

---

• Publications > Belle de Zuylen Papers > 2011 > Van Oostrum, van Dijk