Revision as of 16:09, 19 December 2012 (edit) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) (New page: <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ == Valérie Cossy == <br><br> '''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br> '''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br...) ← Previous diff		Current revision (16:36, 19 December 2012) (edit) (undo) SvDijk (Talk | contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<br>__NOEDITSECTION__		<br>__NOEDITSECTION__
-	== Valérie Cossy ==	+	== Laurence Vanoflen ==
	<br><br>		<br><br>
-	'''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br>	+	'''Rousseau, Charrière… et Fiévée :'''<br>
-	'''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br><br>	+	'''l’économie des alliances. Regards croisés sur l’inégalité sociale '''<br><br>
	'''Abstract'''<br><br>		'''Abstract'''<br><br>
-		+	In the history of ideas, Isabelle de Charrière is still too often catalogued among the conservative readers of Rousseau. This article focuses on her ''Eloge de Jean-Jacques Rousseau'' in order to challenge this view as well as it questions the usual notion that her knowledge of Rousseau was superficial. The novels she wrote during the revolutionary era show, if it were necessary, how consistently she was involved in the issues that were central to Rousseau’s thinking: his rejection of an “extreme inequality” (cf. his article about “Economie politique” from 1755), for instance, such as Julie articulates it in the utopia of Clarens reappears, rather unexpectedly, at the beginning of ''Henriette et Richard'' [1792-93] through the words of the old Giroud. Charrière’s insistence on moderation during the years 1789-1792 still informs the unfinished (and long lost) ''Victoire ou la vertu sans bruit'' [1803?], in which one can detect an ironic rewriting of another novel, ''La Dot de Suzette'' (1798) by Joseph Fiévée, a journalist in favour of monarchy. Charrière’s two novels locate within the sentiments she endeavours to promote – sympathy and pity ''versus'' Fiévée’s emphasis on gratitude – the deep kinship that unites her to the author of the ''Contrat Social''.
-	Raymond Trousson:<br>	+
-	*[[Deux Neuchâtelois]] au concours de l’Académie française en 1790 : Isabelle de Charrière et François-Louis d’Escherny (p. 27)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Timothée Léchot: <br>	+
-	* [[L’exception qui confirme les règles]] : le génie littéraire de Rousseau perçu par Isabelle de Charrière et Henri-David Chaillet (p. 41)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Virginie Pasche:<br>	+
-	*[[Théorie et enjeux moraux]] de la fiction chez Rousseau et Isabelle de Charrière (p. 55)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Laurence Vanoflen:<br>	+
-	*[[Rousseau, Charrière… et Fiévée]] : l’économie des alliances. Regards croisés sur l’inégalité sociale (p. 71) <br><br>	+
-		+
-	Paul Pelckmans:<br>	+
-	*[[Du Vicaire Savoyard à l’Abbé de la Tour]]. A propos d’''Honorine d’Userche'' (p. 84)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Jean-Daniel Candaux:<br>	+
-	*[[Thérèse Levasseur]], ou les avatars d’une image (1762-1789) (p. 99)<br><br><br>	+
-		+
-	'''RECENTLY DISCOVERED'''<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Kees van Strien: <br>	+
-	*Monsieur de Charrière travelling tutor to Belle’s brother Willem-René (p. 109)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Hein H. Jongbloed: <br>	+
-	* Four new items of “Belle-lettrie” (1797-1799)(p. 117)<br><br><br>	+
-		+
	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>

---

Current revision

Laurence Vanoflen

Rousseau, Charrière… et Fiévée :
l’économie des alliances. Regards croisés sur l’inégalité sociale

Abstract

In the history of ideas, Isabelle de Charrière is still too often catalogued among the conservative readers of Rousseau. This article focuses on her Eloge de Jean-Jacques Rousseau in order to challenge this view as well as it questions the usual notion that her knowledge of Rousseau was superficial. The novels she wrote during the revolutionary era show, if it were necessary, how consistently she was involved in the issues that were central to Rousseau’s thinking: his rejection of an “extreme inequality” (cf. his article about “Economie politique” from 1755), for instance, such as Julie articulates it in the utopia of Clarens reappears, rather unexpectedly, at the beginning of Henriette et Richard [1792-93] through the words of the old Giroud. Charrière’s insistence on moderation during the years 1789-1792 still informs the unfinished (and long lost) Victoire ou la vertu sans bruit [1803?], in which one can detect an ironic rewriting of another novel, La Dot de Suzette (1798) by Joseph Fiévée, a journalist in favour of monarchy. Charrière’s two novels locate within the sentiments she endeavours to promote – sympathy and pity versus Fiévée’s emphasis on gratitude – the deep kinship that unites her to the author of the Contrat Social.

SvD, December 2012

---

• Publications > Belle de Zuylen Papers > 2012