Revision as of 16:08, 19 December 2012 (edit) SvDijk (Talk | contribs) (New page: <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ == Valérie Cossy == <br><br> '''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br> '''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br...) ← Previous diff		Current revision (16:30, 19 December 2012) (edit) (undo) SvDijk (Talk | contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<br>__NOEDITSECTION__		<br>__NOEDITSECTION__
-	== Valérie Cossy ==	+	== Timothée Léchot ==
	<br><br>		<br><br>
-	'''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br>	+	'''L’exception qui confirme les règles :'''<br>
-	'''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br><br>	+	'''le génie littéraire de Rousseau perçu par Isabelle de Charrière et Henri-David Chaillet'''<br><br>
	'''Abstract'''<br><br>		'''Abstract'''<br><br>
-		+	Among Charrière’s chief interlocutors at Colombier one finds the pas-tor Henri-David Chaillet, who shared her admiration of Rousseau. Ex-erting a mutual influence on each other, the two writers develop simi-lar points of view, the comparison of which tells us much about how Charrière and Chaillet read his philosophical ideas and how they ap-preciated his style as an author. Both keen on the rules of classicism, Charrière and Chaillet endeavour to understand Rousseau within an aesthetic framework that has become insufficient to account for his writing. Several rhetoric strategies are developed by them to convey what they perceive as Rousseau’s singularity while contemplating the possibility of locating him within a French literary pantheon.
-	Raymond Trousson:<br>	+
-	*[[Deux Neuchâtelois]] au concours de l’Académie française en 1790 : Isabelle de Charrière et François-Louis d’Escherny (p. 27)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Timothée Léchot: <br>	+
-	* [[L’exception qui confirme les règles]] : le génie littéraire de Rousseau perçu par Isabelle de Charrière et Henri-David Chaillet (p. 41)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Virginie Pasche:<br>	+
-	*[[Théorie et enjeux moraux]] de la fiction chez Rousseau et Isabelle de Charrière (p. 55)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Laurence Vanoflen:<br>	+
-	*[[Rousseau, Charrière… et Fiévée]] : l’économie des alliances. Regards croisés sur l’inégalité sociale (p. 71) <br><br>	+
-		+
-	Paul Pelckmans:<br>	+
-	*[[Du Vicaire Savoyard à l’Abbé de la Tour]]. A propos d’''Honorine d’Userche'' (p. 84)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Jean-Daniel Candaux:<br>	+
-	*[[Thérèse Levasseur]], ou les avatars d’une image (1762-1789) (p. 99)<br><br><br>	+
-		+
-	'''RECENTLY DISCOVERED'''<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Kees van Strien: <br>	+
-	*Monsieur de Charrière travelling tutor to Belle’s brother Willem-René (p. 109)<br><br>	+
-		+
-	Hein H. Jongbloed: <br>	+
-	* Four new items of “Belle-lettrie” (1797-1799)(p. 117)<br><br><br>	+
-		+
	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>

---

Current revision

Timothée Léchot

L’exception qui confirme les règles :
le génie littéraire de Rousseau perçu par Isabelle de Charrière et Henri-David Chaillet

Abstract

Among Charrière’s chief interlocutors at Colombier one finds the pas-tor Henri-David Chaillet, who shared her admiration of Rousseau. Ex-erting a mutual influence on each other, the two writers develop simi-lar points of view, the comparison of which tells us much about how Charrière and Chaillet read his philosophical ideas and how they ap-preciated his style as an author. Both keen on the rules of classicism, Charrière and Chaillet endeavour to understand Rousseau within an aesthetic framework that has become insufficient to account for his writing. Several rhetoric strategies are developed by them to convey what they perceive as Rousseau’s singularity while contemplating the possibility of locating him within a French literary pantheon.

SvD, December 2012

---

• Publications > Belle de Zuylen Papers > 2012