(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 16:09, 19 December 2012 (edit)
SvDijk (Talk | contribs)
(New page: <br>__NOEDITSECTION__ == Valérie Cossy == <br><br> '''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br> '''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br...)
← Previous diff
Current revision (16:38, 19 December 2012) (edit) (undo)
SvDijk (Talk | contribs)

 
Line 1: Line 1:
<br>__NOEDITSECTION__ <br>__NOEDITSECTION__
-== Valérie Cossy ==+== Paul Pelckmans ==
<br><br> <br><br>
-'''Une égalité particulière: Rousseau et les '''<br>+'''Du Vicaire Savoyard à l’Abbé de la Tour. A propos d’''Honorine d’Userche'''<br><br>
-'''incohérences de la domination masculine selon Isabelle de Charrière'''<br><br>+
'''Abstract'''<br><br> '''Abstract'''<br><br>
- +The four novellas in the collection of the Abbé de la Tour offer, according to Charrière herself, some personal variation on themes inspired by Rousseau. In this respect, ''Honorine d’Userche'' develops some of the considerations of his “Vicaire savoyard”. Charrière’s indebtedness to this passage of ''Emile'' often goes unrecorded because she focuses on those aspects usually disregarded by modern readers. ''Honorine d’Userche'', indeed, is not about a Rousseauist kind of faith grounded in the emotions. But this novella by Charrière is, like Rousseau’s ''Vicaire'', concerned with the decline of religious feelings as well as it reproduces his interrogations about the necessity of a compromise between a spontaneous or sentimental form of faith and more orthodox beliefs.
-Raymond Trousson:<br> +
-*[[Deux Neuchâtelois]] au concours de l’Académie française en 1790 : Isabelle de Charrière et François-Louis d’Escherny (p. 27)<br><br>+
- +
-Timothée Léchot: <br> +
-* [[L’exception qui confirme les règles]] : le génie littéraire de Rousseau perçu par Isabelle de Charrière et Henri-David Chaillet (p. 41)<br><br>+
- +
-Virginie Pasche:<br> +
-*[[Théorie et enjeux moraux]] de la fiction chez Rousseau et Isabelle de Charrière (p. 55)<br><br>+
- +
-Laurence Vanoflen:<br> +
-*[[Rousseau, Charrière… et Fiévée]] : l’économie des alliances. Regards croisés sur l’inégalité sociale (p. 71) <br><br>+
- +
-Paul Pelckmans:<br> +
-*[[Du Vicaire Savoyard à l’Abbé de la Tour]]. A propos d’''Honorine d’Userche'' (p. 84)<br><br>+
- +
-Jean-Daniel Candaux:<br> +
-*[[Thérèse Levasseur]], ou les avatars d’une image (1762-1789) (p. 99)<br><br><br>+
- +
-'''RECENTLY DISCOVERED'''<br><br>+
- +
-Kees van Strien: <br> +
-*Monsieur de Charrière travelling tutor to Belle’s brother Willem-René (p. 109)<br><br>+
- +
-Hein H. Jongbloed: <br> +
-* Four new items of “Belle-lettrie” (1797-1799)(p. 117)<br><br><br>+

Current revision


Paul Pelckmans



Du Vicaire Savoyard à l’Abbé de la Tour. A propos d’Honorine d’Userche

Abstract

The four novellas in the collection of the Abbé de la Tour offer, according to Charrière herself, some personal variation on themes inspired by Rousseau. In this respect, Honorine d’Userche develops some of the considerations of his “Vicaire savoyard”. Charrière’s indebtedness to this passage of Emile often goes unrecorded because she focuses on those aspects usually disregarded by modern readers. Honorine d’Userche, indeed, is not about a Rousseauist kind of faith grounded in the emotions. But this novella by Charrière is, like Rousseau’s Vicaire, concerned with the decline of religious feelings as well as it reproduces his interrogations about the necessity of a compromise between a spontaneous or sentimental form of faith and more orthodox beliefs.






SvD, December 2012



Personal tools