(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 14:01, 9 August 2007 (edit)
Susanne (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 14:20, 9 August 2007 (edit) (undo)
Susanne (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 7: Line 7:
* [[Van den Branden en Frederiks]] * [[Van den Branden en Frederiks]]
* [[Witsen Geysbeek]] * [[Witsen Geysbeek]]
- 
-'''Theater history''': 
-* [[Worp]] 
'''General literary history''': '''General literary history''':
Line 21: Line 18:
* [[J. M. Schrant]], ''Proeven van Nederlandschen proza st?l, uit zeven eeuwen'', Gend, A.B. Stéven, 1829. * [[J. M. Schrant]], ''Proeven van Nederlandschen proza st?l, uit zeven eeuwen'', Gend, A.B. Stéven, 1829.
* [[N.G. van Kampen]], ''Bloemlezing uit Nederlandsche prozaschrijvers'', Haarlem, Erven Francois Bohn, 1843. (3 delen) * [[N.G. van Kampen]], ''Bloemlezing uit Nederlandsche prozaschrijvers'', Haarlem, Erven Francois Bohn, 1843. (3 delen)
 +
 +'''Theater history''':
 +* [[Worp]]
'''Women’s literary history''': '''Women’s literary history''':

Revision as of 14:20, 9 August 2007

The beginnings of literary historiography form an essential phase : in the Netherlands it concerns essentially 19th century texts, but some earlier inventories have been included here. In the 19th-century material a view of women’s participation in literature can be supposed to have been fixed. But this has to be seriously analyzed. Such a study is made easier thanks to online presence of some of these literary histories: mentions of women writers can be studied in their immediate context. [...]


General history:

General literary history:

Theater history:

Women’s literary history:

Via secundary literature:

Personal tools