Articles in the press - Revision history

AKulsdom at 10:37, 22 September 2010

AKulsdom — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:37:08 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 22 September 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category. <br><br>		The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category. <br><br>

-	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents (books by [[Bel]], [[Kuipers]], [[Streng]] a.o.). Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. For these thirteen years a certain number of supplementary periodicals have been perused: [[1756]], [[1763]], [[1785]], [[1793]], [[1810]], [[1821]], [[1832]], [[1840]], [[1856]], [[1864]], [[1874]], [[1882]], [[1890]]. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years. However, it will continue to be necessary, when treating particular cases or questions, to add further data.<br><br>	+	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents (books by Bel, Kuipers, Streng a.o.). Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. For these thirteen years a certain number of supplementary periodicals have been perused: [[1756]], [[1763]], [[1785]], [[1793]], [[1810]], [[1821]], [[1832]], [[1840]], [[1856]], [[1864]], [[1874]], [[1882]], [[1890]]. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years. However, it will continue to be necessary, when treating particular cases or questions, to add further data.<br><br>

	At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).<br><br>		At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).<br><br>

AKulsdom at 08:13, 22 September 2010

AKulsdom — Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:13:21 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:13, 22 September 2010
Line 63:		Line 63:
	<hr>		<hr>
	<br>		<br>
-	*Note that informations contained in the database ''WomenWriters'' have been derived from contemporary sources, which may contain errors. Also important: when arriving in the database ''WomenWriters'', your status is: "not logged on", which means that you have only partial view. For complete view and participation in the project, take contact.<br><br>	+	*Note that when arriving in the database ''WomenWriters'' your status will be "not logged on", meaning that your access to the database is limited. For complete access (and participation in the project), contact [mailto:suzan.van.dijk@huygensinstituut.knaw.nl Suzan van Dijk].<br><br>
	<hr>		<hr>
	<br>		<br>
	*Sources > Dutch sources > Articles in the press <br><br>		*Sources > Dutch sources > Articles in the press <br><br>

SvDijk at 20:25, 20 September 2007

SvDijk — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:25:25 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 20 September 2007
Line 55:		Line 55:

	'''Bibliography''':		'''Bibliography''':
-	* M. Matthijsen and E. Wiskerke, "Bibliografie literaire tijdschriften" 1-4, published in ''De negentiende eeuw'', 1977-1983.	+	* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, "Bibliografie literaire tijdschriften" 1-4, published in ''De negentiende eeuw'', 1977-1983.
	* G.J. Johannes, ''De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830''. The Hague, 1995.		* G.J. Johannes, ''De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830''. The Hague, 1995.

SvDijk at 21:09, 16 September 2007

SvDijk — Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:09:37 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 16 September 2007
Line 55:		Line 55:

	'''Bibliography''':		'''Bibliography''':
-	* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, "Bibliografie literaire tijdschriften" 1-4, published in ''De negentiende eeuw'', 1977-1983.	+	* M. Matthijsen and E. Wiskerke, "Bibliografie literaire tijdschriften" 1-4, published in ''De negentiende eeuw'', 1977-1983.
	* G.J. Johannes, ''De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830''. The Hague, 1995.		* G.J. Johannes, ''De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830''. The Hague, 1995.

SvDijk at 08:25, 16 September 2007

SvDijk — Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:25:47 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 16 September 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category. <br><br>		The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category. <br><br>

-	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents. Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. For these thirteen years a certain number of supplementary periodicals have been perused: [[1756]], [[1763]], [[1785]], [[1793]], [[1810]], [[1821]], [[1832]], [[1840]], [[1856]], [[1864]], [[1874]], [[1882]], [[1890]]. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years. However, it will continue to be necessary, when treating particular cases or questions, to add further data.<br><br>	+	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents (books by [[Bel]], [[Kuipers]], [[Streng]] a.o.). Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. For these thirteen years a certain number of supplementary periodicals have been perused: [[1756]], [[1763]], [[1785]], [[1793]], [[1810]], [[1821]], [[1832]], [[1840]], [[1856]], [[1864]], [[1874]], [[1882]], [[1890]]. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years. However, it will continue to be necessary, when treating particular cases or questions, to add further data.<br><br>

	At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).<br><br>		At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).<br><br>
Line 12:		Line 12:
	It is well known that literary critique is the most currently consulted type of reception document. Often however, conclusions are drawn too easily: comparison to other reception types illustrates that – as we know very well for the modern situation – works praised in the periodical press are not always appreciated by the reading public. This “conflict” is of course relevant for research about non-canonized authors, in particular for those who enjoyed large success: many of whom were women. <br><br>		It is well known that literary critique is the most currently consulted type of reception document. Often however, conclusions are drawn too easily: comparison to other reception types illustrates that – as we know very well for the modern situation – works praised in the periodical press are not always appreciated by the reading public. This “conflict” is of course relevant for research about non-canonized authors, in particular for those who enjoyed large success: many of whom were women. <br><br>

-	The different periodicals considered up to now (i.e. September 2007) have delivered [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&media_ID=2&RecCountry_ID=2&pageSize=100&order=ca.name more than 3000 records]. This number will continue to expand, but slower than: the digitizing project concerning Dutch reception has been closed in September 2007.<br><br>	+	The different periodicals considered up to now (i.e. September 2007) have delivered [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&media_ID=2&RecCountry_ID=2&pageSize=100&order=ca.name more than 3000 records]. This number will continue to expand, but slower: the digitizing project concerning Dutch reception has been closed in September 2007.<br><br>

	Periodicals used here as sources are: <br>		Periodicals used here as sources are: <br>
Line 55:		Line 55:

	'''Bibliography''':		'''Bibliography''':
-	* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, ‘Bibliografie literaire tijdschriften’ 1-4, published in ''De negentiende eeuw'', 1977-1983.	+	* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, "Bibliografie literaire tijdschriften" 1-4, published in ''De negentiende eeuw'', 1977-1983.
	* G.J. Johannes, ''De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830''. The Hague, 1995.		* G.J. Johannes, ''De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830''. The Hague, 1995.

SvDijk at 12:54, 15 September 2007

SvDijk — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:54:04 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 15 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	__NOEDITSECTION__	+	<br>__NOEDITSECTION__
	== The periodical press ==		== The periodical press ==

Line 6:		Line 6:
	The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category. <br><br>		The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category. <br><br>

-	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents. Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. Thirteen reference years have been chosen: [[1756]], [[1763]], [[1785]], [[1793]], [[1810]], [[1821]], [[1832]], [[1840]], [[1856]], [[1864]], [[1874]], [[1882]], [[1890]]. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years.<br><br>	+	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents. Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. For these thirteen years a certain number of supplementary periodicals have been perused: [[1756]], [[1763]], [[1785]], [[1793]], [[1810]], [[1821]], [[1832]], [[1840]], [[1856]], [[1864]], [[1874]], [[1882]], [[1890]]. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years. However, it will continue to be necessary, when treating particular cases or questions, to add further data.<br><br>

	At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).<br><br>		At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).<br><br>
Line 12:		Line 12:
	It is well known that literary critique is the most currently consulted type of reception document. Often however, conclusions are drawn too easily: comparison to other reception types illustrates that – as we know very well for the modern situation – works praised in the periodical press are not always appreciated by the reading public. This “conflict” is of course relevant for research about non-canonized authors, in particular for those who enjoyed large success: many of whom were women. <br><br>		It is well known that literary critique is the most currently consulted type of reception document. Often however, conclusions are drawn too easily: comparison to other reception types illustrates that – as we know very well for the modern situation – works praised in the periodical press are not always appreciated by the reading public. This “conflict” is of course relevant for research about non-canonized authors, in particular for those who enjoyed large success: many of whom were women. <br><br>

-	The different periodicals considered up to now (i.e. April 2007) have delivered some [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&media_ID=2&RecCountry_ID=2&pageSize=100&order=ca.name 3000 records]. This number will continue to expand: the present project is to be continued until September 2007.<br><br>	+	The different periodicals considered up to now (i.e. September 2007) have delivered [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&media_ID=2&RecCountry_ID=2&pageSize=100&order=ca.name more than 3000 records]. This number will continue to expand, but slower than: the digitizing project concerning Dutch reception has been closed in September 2007.<br><br>

-	Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows: <br>	+	Periodicals used here as sources are: <br>

	'''Literary press''':		'''Literary press''':
Line 36:		Line 36:
	* [[Vriend des Vaderlands]]		* [[Vriend des Vaderlands]]

-	'''Periodicals publishing original texts''':	+	'''Periodicals publishing original texts and translations''':
	* [[Europa]]		* [[Europa]]

Line 55:		Line 55:

	'''Bibliography''':		'''Bibliography''':
-	* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, ‘Bibliografie literaire tijdschrijften’ 1-4, in afleveringen gepubliceerd in De negentiende eeuw, 1977-1983.	+	* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, ‘Bibliografie literaire tijdschriften’ 1-4, published in ''De negentiende eeuw'', 1977-1983.
-	* G.J. Johannes, De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830. The Hague: SDU, 1995.	+	* G.J. Johannes, ''De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830''. The Hague, 1995.

SvDijk at 08:32, 14 September 2007

SvDijk — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:32:34 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 14 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category.	+	__NOEDITSECTION__
		+	== The periodical press ==

-	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents. Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. Thirteen reference years have been chosen: 1756, 1763, 1785, 1793, 1810, 1821, 1832, 1840, 1856, 1864, 1874, 1882, 1890. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years.

-	At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).	+	<br><br>
		+	The notion of “press” is large and concerns all sorts of periodical publications – not only from highly specialized to very general, but also from the first seventeenth-century newspapers to late-nineteenth-century illustrated weeklies. In order to find reactions regarding women’s literary contributions, a certain number of reviews and magazines have been perused. They had been selected on the basis of different criteria: authority, possible relevance for women’s questions, success etc. Note that periodicals explicitly addressing a female public constitute a separate category. <br><br>

-	It is well known that literary critique is the most currently consulted type of reception document. Often however, conclusions are drawn too easily: comparison to other reception types illustrates that – as we know very well for the modern situation – works praised in the periodical press are not always appreciated by the reading public. This “conflict” is of course relevant for research about non-canonized authors, in particular for those who enjoyed large success: many of whom were women.	+	Given the enormous volume of this material, selections had to be made. Whereas some of the journals have been perused completely (in general: starting from indexes), in other cases they have been approached by the intermediary of recent secondary literature or modern cataloguing of their contents. Finally, we have also selected a number of years to be considered particularly relevant because of the publication, in that same year, of significant works by women or of female or feminist periodicals. Thirteen reference years have been chosen: [[1756]], [[1763]], [[1785]], [[1793]], [[1810]], [[1821]], [[1832]], [[1840]], [[1856]], [[1864]], [[1874]], [[1882]], [[1890]]. This will allow more thorough analysis of women’s reception in those specific years.<br><br>

-	The different periodicals considered up to now (i.e. April 2007) have delivered some [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&media_ID=2&RecCountry_ID=2&pageSize=100&order=ca.name 3000 records]. This number will continue to expand: the present project is to be continued until September 2007.	+	At the moment of entering data, for some of these journals we used paper copies, others were consulted in digital versions or online. It is clear that sooner or later more and more of these texts, and possibly all of them, will be available on the internet. We decided however not to wait till then: when internet versions did exist, we have had the benefit of it – establishing hyperlinks in the records of our database, for example –, but otherwise we provided references and informations about their presence in public libraries, in some exceptional cases even citations. (In order to dispose of the complete records of the database, a password is needed – see database [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl ''WomenWriters'']).<br><br>

-	Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows:	+	It is well known that literary critique is the most currently consulted type of reception document. Often however, conclusions are drawn too easily: comparison to other reception types illustrates that – as we know very well for the modern situation – works praised in the periodical press are not always appreciated by the reading public. This “conflict” is of course relevant for research about non-canonized authors, in particular for those who enjoyed large success: many of whom were women. <br><br>
		+
		+	The different periodicals considered up to now (i.e. April 2007) have delivered some [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/results.asp?type=receptions&work_authorName=&notesfield=&work_Title=&rec_Year=&Editor_ID=geen&rec_authorName=&Rec_Title=&reference=&media_ID=2&RecCountry_ID=2&pageSize=100&order=ca.name 3000 records]. This number will continue to expand: the present project is to be continued until September 2007.<br><br>
		+
		+	Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows: <br>

	'''Literary press''':		'''Literary press''':
Line 54:		Line 59:


-	SvD, April 2007.	+	SvD, September 2007<br><br>
		+
		+	<hr>
		+	<br>
		+	*Note that informations contained in the database ''WomenWriters'' have been derived from contemporary sources, which may contain errors. Also important: when arriving in the database ''WomenWriters'', your status is: "not logged on", which means that you have only partial view. For complete view and participation in the project, take contact.<br><br>
		+	<hr>
		+	<br>
		+	*Sources > Dutch sources > Articles in the press <br><br>

Susanne at 13:00, 9 August 2007

Susanne — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:00:35 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 9 August 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows:		Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows:

-	'''Literaire tijdschriften''':	+	'''Literary press''':
	* [[Algemeen Letterlievend Maandschrift]]		* [[Algemeen Letterlievend Maandschrift]]
	* [[Algemene Konst- en Letterbode]]		* [[Algemene Konst- en Letterbode]]
	* [[Boekzaal]]		* [[Boekzaal]]
-
	* [[De Gids]]		* [[De Gids]]
	* [[De Nieuwe Gids]]		* [[De Nieuwe Gids]]

Susanne at 12:48, 9 August 2007

Susanne — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:48:50 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 9 August 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows:		Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows:

-	Literaire tijdschriften:	+	'''Literaire tijdschriften''':
	* [[Algemeen Letterlievend Maandschrift]]		* [[Algemeen Letterlievend Maandschrift]]
	* [[Algemene Konst- en Letterbode]]		* [[Algemene Konst- en Letterbode]]
	* [[Boekzaal]]		* [[Boekzaal]]
-	* [[Busken Huet, Literarische Fantasiën en Kritieken]]	+
	* [[De Gids]]		* [[De Gids]]
	* [[De Nieuwe Gids]]		* [[De Nieuwe Gids]]
Line 24:		Line 24:
	* [[Recensent (ook der recensenten)]]		* [[Recensent (ook der recensenten)]]

-	Spectators and similar:	+	'''Spectators and similar''':
	* [[De Denker]]		* [[De Denker]]
	* [[De Huisvriend]]		* [[De Huisvriend]]
Line 32:		Line 32:
	* [[Vriend des Vaderlands]]		* [[Vriend des Vaderlands]]

-	Periodicals publishing original texts:	+	'''Periodicals publishing original texts''':
	* [[Europa]]		* [[Europa]]

-	General cultural press	+	'''General cultural press''':
	* [[Vaderlandsche Letteroefeningen (1761-1876)]]		* [[Vaderlandsche Letteroefeningen (1761-1876)]]

		+	'''Influential critics''':
		+	* [[Busken Huet, Literarische Fantasiën en Kritieken]]

		+	'''Francophone periodicals''':
		+	* Bibliothèque des Sciences et des Beaux-Arts (1754-1778)

		+	'''Women's press'''
		+	* [[Women’s press: article]]

-	'''Bibliography''':

		+
		+
		+	'''Bibliography''':
	* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, ‘Bibliografie literaire tijdschrijften’ 1-4, in afleveringen gepubliceerd in De negentiende eeuw, 1977-1983.		* M. Mathijsen and E. Wiskerke, ‘Bibliografie literaire tijdschrijften’ 1-4, in afleveringen gepubliceerd in De negentiende eeuw, 1977-1983.
	* G.J. Johannes, De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830. The Hague: SDU, 1995.		* G.J. Johannes, De barometer van de smaak. Tijdschrijften in Nederland 1770-1830. The Hague: SDU, 1995.

Susanne at 12:33, 9 August 2007

Susanne — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:33:01 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 9 August 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows:		Periodicals used or to be used as sources are as follows:

-		+	Literaire tijdschriften:
	* [[Algemeen Letterlievend Maandschrift]]		* [[Algemeen Letterlievend Maandschrift]]
	* [[Algemene Konst- en Letterbode]]		* [[Algemene Konst- en Letterbode]]
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* [[De Gids]]		* [[De Gids]]
	* [[De Nieuwe Gids]]		* [[De Nieuwe Gids]]
-	* [[Denker]]
-	* [[Europa]]
	* [[Leeskabinet]]		* [[Leeskabinet]]
		+	* [[Letterkundig Magazijn]]
	* [[Nederland]]		* [[Nederland]]
	* [[Nederlandsche Bibliotheek]]		* [[Nederlandsche Bibliotheek]]
		+	* [[Recensent (ook der recensenten)]]
		+
		+	Spectators and similar:
		+	* [[De Denker]]
		+	* [[De Huisvriend]]
	* [[Nederlandsche Spectator]]		* [[Nederlandsche Spectator]]
	* [[Portefeuille]]		* [[Portefeuille]]
-	* [[Recensent (ook der recensenten)]]
	* [[Tijdspiegel]]		* [[Tijdspiegel]]
-	* [[Vaderlandsche Letteroefeningen (1761-1876)]]
	* [[Vriend des Vaderlands]]		* [[Vriend des Vaderlands]]
		+
		+	Periodicals publishing original texts:
		+	* [[Europa]]
		+
		+	General cultural press
		+	* [[Vaderlandsche Letteroefeningen (1761-1876)]]
		+
		+