Identical agenda - Revision history

SvDijk at 10:41, 18 November 2009

2009-11-18T10:41:26Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 18 November 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>
	'''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read:<br>		'''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read:<br>
-	*MoU, basis of the Action (COST website)<br>	+	*MoU, basis of the Action (in [http://w3.cost.esf.org/index.php?id=233&action_number=IS0901 COST website])<br>
-	*"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message) <br>	+	*"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in previous mail message) <br>
-	*The 4 articles put online in this NEWW site (Schabert, Moretti, Hoogenboom, Van Dijk). <br><br><br>	+	*The 4 articles put online in this NEWW site, previous screen with program (Schabert, Moretti, Hoogenboom, Van Dijk). <br><br><br>

	'''Agenda for each of the WGs:'''<br>		'''Agenda for each of the WGs:'''<br>
Line 23:		Line 23:
	12. AOB <br><br>		12. AOB <br><br>

-	SvD, 17 November 2009<br><br><br>	+	SvD, 18 November 2009<br><br><br>

	<hr>		<hr>
	<br>		<br>
	*Conferences > NEWW November meetings > 2009 > Agenda <br><br>		*Conferences > NEWW November meetings > 2009 > Agenda <br><br>

SvDijk at 22:26, 17 November 2009

2009-11-17T22:26:20Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 17 November 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*MoU, basis of the Action (COST website)<br>		*MoU, basis of the Action (COST website)<br>
	*"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message) <br>		*"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message) <br>
-	*The 4 articles put online in this NEWW site (Schabert, Moretti, Hoogenboom, Van Dijk). <br><br>	+	*The 4 articles put online in this NEWW site (Schabert, Moretti, Hoogenboom, Van Dijk). <br><br><br>

	'''Agenda for each of the WGs:'''<br>		'''Agenda for each of the WGs:'''<br>
Line 22:		Line 22:
	11. suggestions for STSMs <br>		11. suggestions for STSMs <br>
	12. AOB <br><br>		12. AOB <br><br>
		+
		+	SvD, 17 November 2009<br><br><br>
		+
		+	<hr>
		+	<br>
		+	*Conferences > NEWW November meetings > 2009 > Agenda <br><br>

SvDijk at 22:24, 17 November 2009

2009-11-17T22:24:27Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 17 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	<br>__NOEDITSECTION__
		+	== Working Group meetings 21 November 2009 ==


-		+	<br><br><br>
	'''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read:<br>		'''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read:<br>
	*MoU, basis of the Action (COST website)<br>		*MoU, basis of the Action (COST website)<br>

SvDijk: New page: '''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read:
MoU, basis of the Action (COST website)
"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message)
*The 4 articles put on...

2009-11-16T16:48:23Z

New page: '''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read: *MoU, basis of the Action (COST website) *"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message) *The 4 articles put on...

New page

'''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read: 
*MoU, basis of the Action (COST website) 
*"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message) 
*The 4 articles put online in this NEWW site (Schabert, Moretti, Hoogenboom, Van Dijk). 

'''Agenda for each of the WGs:''' 
1. adoption of the agenda 
2. selection of two persons taking notes 
3. comments on milestones as formulated in the MoU: role of this particular WG 
4. objectives for this WG as formulated in the Work Plan: possible given your own expertise as individual researchers? 
5. comments on the database ''WomenWriters'' and the ways of working in it, as presented in the morning session, from the perspective of this WG [participants are kindly requested to have a try, beforehand, of consultation as well as data entry and trying quantitative approaches] 
6. planning for this Grant period – tasks up to 31 Oct. 2010 
7. collaboration with the other WGs 
8. is the WG as a whole sufficiently equipped, or is it necessary to find supplementary expertise? Is there not too much diversity in the WG? 
9. decisions about ways of communicating 
10. distribution of tasks to individual WG members, for May meeting in view of November milestone 
11. suggestions for STSMs 
12. AOB

Identical agenda - Revision history

SvDijk at 10:41, 18 November 2009

SvDijk at 22:26, 17 November 2009

SvDijk at 22:24, 17 November 2009

SvDijk: New page: '''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read: *MoU, basis of the Action (COST website) *"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message) *The 4 articles put on...

SvDijk: New page: '''N.B.''' WG-members are supposed to have read:
MoU, basis of the Action (COST website)
"Working in the Working Groups" (attached in mail message)
*The 4 articles put on...