22 November 2007 - Revision history

SvDijk at 07:03, 7 October 2012

2012-10-07T07:03:47Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 7 October 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>
-	November 22 2007 took place the first of these three annual meetings. The theme of this day was the question of female authorship: “What is a female author? Who is a woman writer?”. Continuation of the earlier discussion furthered by Michel Foucault's “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” [1] – but with particular focus on gender aspects, and taking into account research pursued since then, for example, by Nathalie Grande [2] and Alicia Montoya [3]. <br><br>	+	November 22 2007 took place the first of these three annual meetings. The theme of this day was the question of female authorship: '''“What is a female author? Who is a woman writer?”'''. Continuation of the earlier discussion furthered by Michel Foucault's “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” [1] – but with particular focus on gender aspects, and taking into account research pursued since then, for example, by Nathalie Grande [2] and Alicia Montoya [3]. <br><br>
	There were also very practical reasons: in the context of the NEWW-project decisions must be taken about entering women who wrote and published in the project’s database ([[www.databasewomenwriters.nl]]). How to categorize them: as real “writers” or in specific categories of “translators”, “commentators”? Taking into account contemporary judgments or outcomes of canon formation? What about these women’s intentions ?<br><br>		There were also very practical reasons: in the context of the NEWW-project decisions must be taken about entering women who wrote and published in the project’s database ([[www.databasewomenwriters.nl]]). How to categorize them: as real “writers” or in specific categories of “translators”, “commentators”? Taking into account contemporary judgments or outcomes of canon formation? What about these women’s intentions ?<br><br>

SvDijk at 11:50, 7 June 2012

2012-06-07T11:50:28Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 7 June 2012
Line 37:		Line 37:

	14.45 <br>		14.45 <br>
-	'''Annemarie Doornbos''' (University of Amsterdam): <br>	+	'''[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Annemarie_Doornbos Annemarie Doornbos]''' (University of Amsterdam): <br>
	[["Mrs Bosboom-Toussaint" or "Geertruida Toussaint" (1812-1886) ? Male or female writing ?]] <br>		[["Mrs Bosboom-Toussaint" or "Geertruida Toussaint" (1812-1886) ? Male or female writing ?]] <br>

SvDijk at 08:56, 16 September 2010

2010-09-16T08:56:51Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 16 September 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	10.00<br>		10.00<br>
-	Welcome<br>	+	'''Welcome'''<br>

	10.30<br>		10.30<br>
Line 30:		Line 30:

	12.30 <br>		12.30 <br>
-	Lunch at Drift 21 (Hall) <br>	+	'''Lunch''' at Drift 21 (Hall) <br>

	14.00 <br>		14.00 <br>
Line 45:		Line 45:

	16.15<br>		16.15<br>
-	Closing remarks <br>	+	'''Closing remarks''' <br>

	16.30 <br>		16.30 <br>
-	Drinks at Drift 21 <br><br>	+	'''Drinks''' at Drift 21 <br><br>

	[1] Michel Foucault, “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?”, in ''Dits et écrits 1954-1988''. Paris, Gallimard, 1994, vol. I, p. 789-821.<br>		[1] Michel Foucault, “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?”, in ''Dits et écrits 1954-1988''. Paris, Gallimard, 1994, vol. I, p. 789-821.<br>

SvDijk at 08:50, 16 September 2010

2010-09-16T08:50:18Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 September 2010
Line 52:		Line 52:
	[1] Michel Foucault, “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?”, in ''Dits et écrits 1954-1988''. Paris, Gallimard, 1994, vol. I, p. 789-821.<br>		[1] Michel Foucault, “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?”, in ''Dits et écrits 1954-1988''. Paris, Gallimard, 1994, vol. I, p. 789-821.<br>
	[2] Nathalie Grande, ''Stratégies de romancières. De Clélie à La Princesse de Clèves (1654-1678)''. Paris, Champion, 1999.<br>		[2] Nathalie Grande, ''Stratégies de romancières. De Clélie à La Princesse de Clèves (1654-1678)''. Paris, Champion, 1999.<br>
-	[3] Alicia Montoya, ''Marie-Anne Barbier et la tragédie post-classique''. Paris, Champion, 2007. <br><br>	+	[3] Alicia Montoya, ''Marie-Anne Barbier et la tragédie post-classique''. Paris, Champion, 2007. <br><br><br>

-	AsK, September 2010<br><br>	+	AsK, September 2010

SvDijk at 08:49, 16 September 2010

2010-09-16T08:49:48Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 16 September 2010
Line 49:		Line 49:
	16.30 <br>		16.30 <br>
	Drinks at Drift 21 <br><br>		Drinks at Drift 21 <br><br>
-
-
-	AsK, September 2010<br><br><br>
-

	[1] Michel Foucault, “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?”, in ''Dits et écrits 1954-1988''. Paris, Gallimard, 1994, vol. I, p. 789-821.<br>		[1] Michel Foucault, “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?”, in ''Dits et écrits 1954-1988''. Paris, Gallimard, 1994, vol. I, p. 789-821.<br>
	[2] Nathalie Grande, ''Stratégies de romancières. De Clélie à La Princesse de Clèves (1654-1678)''. Paris, Champion, 1999.<br>		[2] Nathalie Grande, ''Stratégies de romancières. De Clélie à La Princesse de Clèves (1654-1678)''. Paris, Champion, 1999.<br>
	[3] Alicia Montoya, ''Marie-Anne Barbier et la tragédie post-classique''. Paris, Champion, 2007. <br><br>		[3] Alicia Montoya, ''Marie-Anne Barbier et la tragédie post-classique''. Paris, Champion, 2007. <br><br>
		+
		+	AsK, September 2010<br><br>
		+

	<hr>		<hr>
	<br>		<br>
	* Conferences > NEWW November meetings > 2007 <br><br>		* Conferences > NEWW November meetings > 2007 <br><br>

SvDijk at 08:49, 16 September 2010

2010-09-16T08:49:16Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 16 September 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	10.30<br>		10.30<br>
-	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Suzan_van_Dijk%2C_Utrecht_University Suzan van Dijk] (UU): <br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Suzan_van_Dijk%2C_Utrecht_University '''Suzan van Dijk'''] (UU): <br>
	[[Short presentation of the project “New approaches to European Women’s Writing”]]<br>		[[Short presentation of the project “New approaches to European Women’s Writing”]]<br>

	11.00<br>		11.00<br>
-	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Teresa_de_Almeida Teresa Sousa de Almeida] (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) and Vanda Anastácio (Universidade de Lisboa):<br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Teresa_de_Almeida '''Teresa Sousa de Almeida'''] (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) and Vanda Anastácio (Universidade de Lisboa):<br>
	Networks around 18th-century Portuguese women authors, in particular around the [[Marquesa d’Alorna]] (1750-1839)<br>		Networks around 18th-century Portuguese women authors, in particular around the [[Marquesa d’Alorna]] (1750-1839)<br>

	11.45 <br>		11.45 <br>
-	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Nina_Geerdink Nina Geerdink] (Free University Amsterdam): <br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Nina_Geerdink '''Nina Geerdink'''] (Free University Amsterdam): <br>
	[[Katharina Lescailje (1649-1711): another Sappho]]<br>		[[Katharina Lescailje (1649-1711): another Sappho]]<br>

Line 33:		Line 33:

	14.00 <br>		14.00 <br>
-	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Agnese_Fidecaro Agnese Fidecaro] (University of Geneva):<br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Agnese_Fidecaro '''Agnese Fidecaro'''] (University of Geneva):<br>
	[[Reflections around "La femme auteur" by Madame de Genlis (1746-1830)]]<br>		[[Reflections around "La femme auteur" by Madame de Genlis (1746-1830)]]<br>

	14.45 <br>		14.45 <br>
-	Annemarie Doornbos (University of Amsterdam): <br>	+	'''Annemarie Doornbos''' (University of Amsterdam): <br>
	[["Mrs Bosboom-Toussaint" or "Geertruida Toussaint" (1812-1886) ? Male or female writing ?]] <br>		[["Mrs Bosboom-Toussaint" or "Geertruida Toussaint" (1812-1886) ? Male or female writing ?]] <br>

	15.30<br>		15.30<br>
-	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Zsuzsanna_Varga Zsuzsanna Varga] (De Montfort University, Leicester):<br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Zsuzsanna_Varga '''Zsuzsanna Varga'''] (De Montfort University, Leicester):<br>
	[http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/author.asp?authorID=340 Margaret Oliphant]’s (1828-1897) reconceptualisation of female authorship <br>		[http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/author.asp?authorID=340 Margaret Oliphant]’s (1828-1897) reconceptualisation of female authorship <br>

SvDijk at 08:47, 16 September 2010

2010-09-16T08:47:59Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 16 September 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>
-	November 22 2007 took place the first of these three annual meetings. The theme of this day was the question of female authorship: “What is a female author ? Who is a woman writer?”. Continuation of the earlier discussion furthered by Michel Foucault's “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” [1] – but with particular focus on gender aspects, and taking into account research pursued since then, for example, by Nathalie Grande [2] and Alicia Montoya [3]. <br><br>	+	November 22 2007 took place the first of these three annual meetings. The theme of this day was the question of female authorship: “What is a female author? Who is a woman writer?”. Continuation of the earlier discussion furthered by Michel Foucault's “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” [1] – but with particular focus on gender aspects, and taking into account research pursued since then, for example, by Nathalie Grande [2] and Alicia Montoya [3]. <br><br>
-	There were also very practical reasons: in the context of the NEWW-project decisions must be taken about including – or not – in the project’s database ([[www.databasewomenwriters.nl]]) women who wrote and published. How to categorize them: as real “writers” or in specific categories of “translators”, “commentators” ? Taking into account contemporary judgments or outcomes of canon formation ? What about these women’s intentions ?<br><br>	+	There were also very practical reasons: in the context of the NEWW-project decisions must be taken about entering women who wrote and published in the project’s database ([[www.databasewomenwriters.nl]]). How to categorize them: as real “writers” or in specific categories of “translators”, “commentators”? Taking into account contemporary judgments or outcomes of canon formation? What about these women’s intentions ?<br><br>

	'''Meeting place''':<br>		'''Meeting place''':<br>
Line 18:		Line 18:

	10.30<br>		10.30<br>
-	Suzan van Dijk (UU): <br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Suzan_van_Dijk%2C_Utrecht_University Suzan van Dijk] (UU): <br>
	[[Short presentation of the project “New approaches to European Women’s Writing”]]<br>		[[Short presentation of the project “New approaches to European Women’s Writing”]]<br>

	11.00<br>		11.00<br>
-	Teresa Sousa de Almeida (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) and Vanda Anastácio (Universidade de Lisboa):<br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Teresa_de_Almeida Teresa Sousa de Almeida] (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) and Vanda Anastácio (Universidade de Lisboa):<br>
	Networks around 18th-century Portuguese women authors, in particular around the [[Marquesa d’Alorna]] (1750-1839)<br>		Networks around 18th-century Portuguese women authors, in particular around the [[Marquesa d’Alorna]] (1750-1839)<br>

	11.45 <br>		11.45 <br>
-	Nina Geerdink (Free University Amsterdam): <br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Nina_Geerdink Nina Geerdink] (Free University Amsterdam): <br>
	[[Katharina Lescailje (1649-1711): another Sappho]]<br>		[[Katharina Lescailje (1649-1711): another Sappho]]<br>

Line 33:		Line 33:

	14.00 <br>		14.00 <br>
-	Agnese Fidecaro (University of Geneva):<br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Agnese_Fidecaro Agnese Fidecaro] (University of Geneva):<br>
	[[Reflections around "La femme auteur" by Madame de Genlis (1746-1830)]]<br>		[[Reflections around "La femme auteur" by Madame de Genlis (1746-1830)]]<br>

Line 41:		Line 41:

	15.30<br>		15.30<br>
-	Zsuzsanna Varga (De Montfort University, Leicester):<br>	+	[http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Zsuzsanna_Varga Zsuzsanna Varga] (De Montfort University, Leicester):<br>
	[http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/author.asp?authorID=340 Margaret Oliphant]’s (1828-1897) reconceptualisation of female authorship <br>		[http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/author.asp?authorID=340 Margaret Oliphant]’s (1828-1897) reconceptualisation of female authorship <br>

Line 51:		Line 51:


-	SvD, January 2008<br><br><br>	+	AsK, September 2010<br><br><br>

SvDijk at 21:04, 17 October 2008

2008-10-17T21:04:53Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 17 October 2008
Line 42:		Line 42:
	15.30<br>		15.30<br>
	Zsuzsanna Varga (De Montfort University, Leicester):<br>		Zsuzsanna Varga (De Montfort University, Leicester):<br>
-	[http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/author.asp?authorID=33 Margaret Oliphant]’s (1828-1897) reconceptualisation of female authorship <br>	+	[http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/author.asp?authorID=340 Margaret Oliphant]’s (1828-1897) reconceptualisation of female authorship <br>

	16.15<br>		16.15<br>

SvDijk at 14:11, 8 January 2008

2008-01-08T14:11:34Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 8 January 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	'''Meeting place''':<br>		'''Meeting place''':<br>

-	Utrecht, one of the buildings of the Faculty of Humanities:<br>	+	Utrecht, Faculty of Humanities:<br>
	Drift 23 (near the Janskerkhof), room 0.12, 10.00 – 17.00.<br><br>		Drift 23 (near the Janskerkhof), room 0.12, 10.00 – 17.00.<br><br>

Line 23:		Line 23:
	11.00<br>		11.00<br>
	Teresa Sousa de Almeida (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) and Vanda Anastácio (Universidade de Lisboa):<br>		Teresa Sousa de Almeida (Universidade Nova de Lisboa) and Vanda Anastácio (Universidade de Lisboa):<br>
-	Networks around 18th-century Portuguese women authors, in particular around the [http://www.databasewomenwriters.nl/author.asp?authorID=1272 Marquesa d’Alorna] (1750-1839)<br>	+	Networks around 18th-century Portuguese women authors, in particular around the [[Marquesa d’Alorna]] (1750-1839)<br>

	11.45 <br>		11.45 <br>
Line 51:		Line 51:


-	SvD, December 2007<br><br><br>	+	SvD, January 2008<br><br><br>

SvDijk at 15:03, 13 December 2007

2007-12-13T15:03:31Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 13 December 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>
-	November 22 took place the first of these three meetings. The theme of this day was the question of female authorship: “What is a female author ? Who is a woman writer?”. Continuation of the earlier discussion furthered by Michel Foucault's “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” [1] – but with particular focus on gender aspects, and taking into account research pursued since then, for example, by Nathalie Grande [2] and Alicia Montoya [3]. <br><br>	+	November 22 2007 took place the first of these three annual meetings. The theme of this day was the question of female authorship: “What is a female author ? Who is a woman writer?”. Continuation of the earlier discussion furthered by Michel Foucault's “Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?” [1] – but with particular focus on gender aspects, and taking into account research pursued since then, for example, by Nathalie Grande [2] and Alicia Montoya [3]. <br><br>
	There were also very practical reasons: in the context of the NEWW-project decisions must be taken about including – or not – in the project’s database ([[www.databasewomenwriters.nl]]) women who wrote and published. How to categorize them: as real “writers” or in specific categories of “translators”, “commentators” ? Taking into account contemporary judgments or outcomes of canon formation ? What about these women’s intentions ?<br><br>		There were also very practical reasons: in the context of the NEWW-project decisions must be taken about including – or not – in the project’s database ([[www.databasewomenwriters.nl]]) women who wrote and published. How to categorize them: as real “writers” or in specific categories of “translators”, “commentators” ? Taking into account contemporary judgments or outcomes of canon formation ? What about these women’s intentions ?<br><br>

Line 51:		Line 51:


-	SvD, November 2007<br><br><br>	+	SvD, December 2007<br><br><br>