(abstract Dow) - Revision history

AKulsdom at 08:14, 12 October 2012

2012-10-12T08:14:23Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 08:14, 12 October 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:


-	<br><br>	+	<br><br>'''Critics and Canonicity: Anglo-American feminism and the case of Jane Austen'''<br><br>
		+
	From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work necessary for the writing of British women’s literary history. Thanks to this research, literary critics who focus on British women writers have long had entire conferences devoted to their field, and women writers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries play a central part in most undergraduate curricula. It has even been suggested that the recovery project is at an end, and that new directions are needed for the study of British women’s writing. It cannot be argued that British literature is a ‘small’ literature of the kind that this colloquium seeks to investigate. Nonetheless, issues of ‘smallness’ are pertinent to a study of British women’s writing. <br><br>		From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work necessary for the writing of British women’s literary history. Thanks to this research, literary critics who focus on British women writers have long had entire conferences devoted to their field, and women writers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries play a central part in most undergraduate curricula. It has even been suggested that the recovery project is at an end, and that new directions are needed for the study of British women’s writing. It cannot be argued that British literature is a ‘small’ literature of the kind that this colloquium seeks to investigate. Nonetheless, issues of ‘smallness’ are pertinent to a study of British women’s writing. <br><br>
	This talk will survey what has been lost in the Anglo-American surveys of women’s writing that have provided us with new canons. By using the example of that most canonical of canonical women writers, [http://neww.huygens.knaw.nl/authors/show/242 Jane Austen], I will examine issues of ‘smallness’ applied to women’s writing, and investigate the reception of Austen both within her own country, and beyond.		This talk will survey what has been lost in the Anglo-American surveys of women’s writing that have provided us with new canons. By using the example of that most canonical of canonical women writers, [http://neww.huygens.knaw.nl/authors/show/242 Jane Austen], I will examine issues of ‘smallness’ applied to women’s writing, and investigate the reception of Austen both within her own country, and beyond.
Line 9:		Line 10:
	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>

-	AsK, September 2010	+	AsK, October 2012
	<hr>		<hr>

	<br>		<br>
-	*Conferences and activities > COST meetings > Ljubljana World Book Capital > Abstract Dow <br><br>	+	*Conferences and activities > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/NEWW_international_conferences NEWW international conferences] > [http://www.womenwriters.nl/index.php/Women%27s_authorship_and_literatures_of_small_countries_in_the_19th_century Ljubljana 2010] > Dow <br><br>

AKulsdom at 12:25, 20 September 2010

2010-09-20T12:25:13Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 20 September 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<br><br>		<br><br>
	From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work necessary for the writing of British women’s literary history. Thanks to this research, literary critics who focus on British women writers have long had entire conferences devoted to their field, and women writers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries play a central part in most undergraduate curricula. It has even been suggested that the recovery project is at an end, and that new directions are needed for the study of British women’s writing. It cannot be argued that British literature is a ‘small’ literature of the kind that this colloquium seeks to investigate. Nonetheless, issues of ‘smallness’ are pertinent to a study of British women’s writing. <br><br>		From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work necessary for the writing of British women’s literary history. Thanks to this research, literary critics who focus on British women writers have long had entire conferences devoted to their field, and women writers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries play a central part in most undergraduate curricula. It has even been suggested that the recovery project is at an end, and that new directions are needed for the study of British women’s writing. It cannot be argued that British literature is a ‘small’ literature of the kind that this colloquium seeks to investigate. Nonetheless, issues of ‘smallness’ are pertinent to a study of British women’s writing. <br><br>
-	This talk will survey what has been lost in the Anglo-American surveys of women’s writing that have provided us with new canons. By using the example of that most canonical of canonical women writers, Jane Austen, I will examine issues of ‘smallness’ applied to women’s writing, and investigate the reception of Austen both within her own country, and beyond.	+	This talk will survey what has been lost in the Anglo-American surveys of women’s writing that have provided us with new canons. By using the example of that most canonical of canonical women writers, [http://neww.huygens.knaw.nl/authors/show/242 Jane Austen], I will examine issues of ‘smallness’ applied to women’s writing, and investigate the reception of Austen both within her own country, and beyond.

	<br><br><br>		<br><br><br>

SvDijk: New page:
NOEDITSECTION == Abstract Gillian Dow ==

From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work ...

2010-09-20T07:58:19Z

New page: __NOEDITSECTION__ == Abstract Gillian Dow == From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work ...

New page

__NOEDITSECTION__
== Abstract Gillian Dow ==

 
From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work necessary for the writing of British women’s literary history. Thanks to this research, literary critics who focus on British women writers have long had entire conferences devoted to their field, and women writers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries play a central part in most undergraduate curricula. It has even been suggested that the recovery project is at an end, and that new directions are needed for the study of British women’s writing. It cannot be argued that British literature is a ‘small’ literature of the kind that this colloquium seeks to investigate. Nonetheless, issues of ‘smallness’ are pertinent to a study of British women’s writing. 
This talk will survey what has been lost in the Anglo-American surveys of women’s writing that have provided us with new canons. By using the example of that most canonical of canonical women writers, Jane Austen, I will examine issues of ‘smallness’ applied to women’s writing, and investigate the reception of Austen both within her own country, and beyond.

 

AsK, September 2010
<hr>

 
*Conferences and activities > COST meetings > Ljubljana World Book Capital > Abstract Dow

(abstract Dow) - Revision history

AKulsdom at 08:14, 12 October 2012

AKulsdom at 12:25, 20 September 2010

SvDijk: New page: __NOEDITSECTION__ == Abstract Gillian Dow == From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work ...

SvDijk: New page:
NOEDITSECTION == Abstract Gillian Dow ==

From the 1970s onwards, Anglo-American literary critics from Ellen Moers to Elaine Showalter have carried out the archival work ...